Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Andrew P. Lentvorski" <bsder@mail.allcaps.org>
Cc:        Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com>, Jay Sachs <jay@eziba.com>, <stanb@awod.com>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>, <des@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup
Message-ID:  <20020709231825.L5990-100000@master.gorean.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020709173249.M68847-100000@mail.allcaps.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote:

> There are actually 2 *separate* problems here.  One concerns 4.6.1 and the
> other concerns stuff after that..

The fact that you see them as two seperate problems is part of the
problem. :)

> I certainly do *not* agree that it should never make it into 4.7 (or
> 4.6-stable or 4.X of any flavor).  If this logic is followed to its

absurd

> conclusion, the 4.X series should cease being developed.

the distinction that you are failing to make is that there are many
different kinds of "changes" to the system. Changes that improve a driver,
changes that update systems like sendmail, even when they require some
small config changes, are candidates for -stable. Changes like this that
have serious potential for causing major problems, AS HAS ALREADY BEEN
DEMONSTRATED; are not.


> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Doug Barton also wrote:
>
> > The fact that it falls back does not mean that users can get into the box
> > without intervention. Besides, you're missing the whole point here. Users
> > should not have to deal with this AT ALL in -stable.
>
> If OpenSSH did a proper "attempt version 2(fail) -> attempt version
> 1(succeed)" fallback, your original users *would* be able to get in
> *without* change.  This fact that this does not occur really is a
> bug/misfeature of OpenSSH.  It really should get reported to them.  By
> fixing this bug/misfeature, *everybody* wins and is happy.

IF, at some point in the future, this works properly, then we can consider
this. But, IT DOESN'T NOW. We don't do development like this in -stable in
any case. We do it in -current.


I'm going to drop this subject now, because there really isn't any further
point in discussing it in this forum.

Doug

-- 
   "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power.
      And in this great conflict, ...  we will see freedom's victory."
	- George W. Bush, President of the United States
          State of the Union, January 28, 2002

         Do YOU Yahoo!?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020709231825.L5990-100000>