Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:04:09 -0700
From:      Alex Zepeda <zipzippy@sonic.net>
To:        Don Lewis <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?
Message-ID:  <20020710180409.GA2555@blarf.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <200207100943.g6A9hswr006550@gw.catspoiler.org>
References:  <20020710075421.GA4924@blarf.homeip.net> <200207100943.g6A9hswr006550@gw.catspoiler.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:43:54AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:

> I haven't had any instability problems in a while on my UP box.

Seems like the UP kernels are more unstable for me.  Go figure.

> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "process lock" locked from ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:332
> 
> I haven't seen that one.  If you can reproduce it, you might try setting
> the debug.witness_ddb sysctl to 1 and get a stack trace from ddb.

This happened just before the box fell over (I'm now running a different 
kernel.. SMP.. so far so good).  What's the downside to sticking 
debug.witness_ddb=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf?

- alex

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020710180409.GA2555>