Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 20:43:49 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: "Christopher H. Laco" <chris.laco@threetech.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl 5.6 vs. 5.8: What will happen in ports? Message-ID: <20020720184349.GD476@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <3479.63.114.73.70.1027095408.squirrel@mail.chrislaco.com> References: <3479.63.114.73.70.1027095408.squirrel@mail.chrislaco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote: > With the release of Perl 5.8, I'll assume it's only a matter of time > before it ends up in ports. > > Will the perl5 port be upgraded 5.6 -> 5.8, or is it time to make a > seperate port like perl5-current? It will be a separate port. I am not sure I like the name `perl5-current', though. I'd rather see it named perl58. > Personally, my vote is for a seperate port so people can choose > between the two..but that's just me. Very reasonable. =Anton. -- | Anton Berezin | FreeBSD: The power to serve | | catpipe Systems ApS _ _ |_ | http://www.FreeBSD.org | | tobez@catpipe.net (_(_|| | tobez@FreeBSD.org | | +45 7021 0050 | Private: tobez@tobez.org | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020720184349.GD476>