Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:36:50 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: rb@gid.co.uk Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3Com Airconnect - new variant? Message-ID: <20020724.183650.38682224.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020724222414.01f9f8f0@gid.co.uk> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020723230525.02056a48@gid.co.uk> <20020724.142626.132443392.imp@bsdimp.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020724222414.01f9f8f0@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <4.3.2.7.2.20020724222414.01f9f8f0@gid.co.uk>
Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> writes:
: Hi,
:
: At 21:26 24/7/02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >[...]
: >So if you have a saner delay value, does it probe? 100ms is a very
: >long time to delay before getting the vendor info (which should
: >already be present before the call to pci_get_vendor due to caching,
: >iirc).
:
: With 3us it usually works, with no delay it will actually probe maybe once
: in 10. 10us looks safe.
OK. I do not understand why this would be needed. Lemme think about
it some.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020724.183650.38682224.imp>