Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:12:48 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Chern Lee <chern@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing articl Message-ID: <20020730151248.A26490@abigail.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020729173812.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 05:38:12PM -0400 References: <20020729141730.E29717-100000@www.freebsdmall.com> <XFMail.20020729173812.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 05:38:12PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: [...] > > > > I don't think I've ever seen a context diff used in the recent doc world, > > but since you're a man of the source I'll make this change. > > Well, -u is definitely the most common, probably something like: > > "The preferred diff(1) format for submitting patches is the unified > output format generated by 'diff -u'. However, for patches that > substantially change a region of code a context output format diff > generated by 'diff -c' may be more readable and thus preferable." > It seems to be a good solution. :) Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020730151248.A26490>