Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:03:18 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Morgan Davis <morgan.davis@hosting.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE? Message-ID: <20020816190318.A22458@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <000001c24591$a1737cb0$0600a8c0@space.lan>; from morgan.davis@hosting.com on Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700 References: <000001c24591$a1737cb0$0600a8c0@space.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Morgan Davis wrote: > Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the > STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release > revision I can't recall. >=20 > In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 > maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line > in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. 4.6.2 is a snapshot of RELENG_4_6, the 4.6 security fix branch, not a snapshot of RELENG_4, the 4.x branch so if you track RELENG_4, you won't ever run 4.6.2. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9Xa7lXY6L6fI4GtQRApb9AKCdmyycMzyb9yZcFkNxuWe2wV50awCgp0Kv wo2JivPLx79ppLiriO6MjUY= =JREM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020816190318.A22458>