Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Aug 2002 05:19:05 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
To:        alane@FreeBSD.org, <dyeske@yahoo.com>, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>
Subject:   Re: Shouldn't xmms-pipe be under audio, with all the other xmms-* plugins?
Message-ID:  <20020826050913.I2666-100000@blues.jpj.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020826051858.GA66885@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It seems to me that xmms-pipe is in the wrong place by being put under
> misc, and that it should go under audio, where all the other xmms-*
> things live. Since it's new, it should be a lot less painful to move it
> than if it had a real history. I'd just do it, by removing and adding,
> except that (1) I wanted at least 1 concurring opinion, and (2) I didn't
> know for sure if repocopy was the more correct way or if I can just
> whack it and re-add it.

It makes sense to me, because xmms is an audio player and xmmspipe is only
for use with xmms.  The repo copy is skipped for things that have no
history, just as you say.
-- 
Trevor Johnson


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020826050913.I2666-100000>