Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:28:02 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@geekpunk.net>, mark tinguely <tinguely@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu>, akoskine@cc.helsinki.fi, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More dynamic KVA_SPACE Message-ID: <20020902172802.GB5232@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3D72EE54.90EA7977@mindspring.com> References: <20020901192245.E1008-100000@taran> <3D72EE54.90EA7977@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:51:32PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > The original claims for the tape-out on the x86-64 from AMD so > that this could happen were September 2001, with sample units > 1Q2002. The AMD schedule slipped. LOL! This slippage is *NOTHING* compared to Merced/IA-64. When I was at HP in the summer of _1997_, Merced was going to come out by end of the year. Hum... a slippage of how many years??? I'd say Intel takes the cake for vapor CPU's. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020902172802.GB5232>