Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:48:10 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? Message-ID: <20020924204809.GA60957@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020924203011.5EF752A7D6@canning.wemm.org> References: <20020923122935.A6108@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020924203011.5EF752A7D6@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 13:30:11 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Oh man, this is going to suck. There are thousands and thousands of third > party scripts that use +n syntax. > > I am most unhappy with this change. :-( It will be possible to have both variants, but +N is valid filename per POSIX, so obsoleted syntax can't be supported. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020924204809.GA60957>