Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:03:25 -0700 From: Claus Assmann <freebsd+current@esmtp.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Journaled filesystem in CURRENT Message-ID: <20020926090325.A24614@zardoc.esmtp.org> In-Reply-To: <20020926111949.5c0da160.Alexander@Leidinger.net>; from Alexander@Leidinger.net on Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:19:49AM %2B0200 References: <200209251319.g8PDJYoD047918@ib.com.ua> <20020925111232.B3686@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020926111949.5c0da160.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:12:34 -0700 Brooks Davis > <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> wrote: > > > > Does CURRENT support journaled filesystem ? > > > > There are not journaling file systems in current at this time. > > Efforts to port both xfs and jfs are underway. > > We have something better than those. SoftUpdates. Much faster than jfs > in metadata intensive operations. But much slower in some other applications. When we tested several filesystems for mailservers (to store the mail queue), JFS and ext3 (in journal mode) beat UFS with softupdates by about a factor of 2. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020926090325.A24614>