Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:43:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: SO_TIMESTAMP Message-ID: <200209271743.g8RHhbu6011907@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <09ce01c26630$ba177cc0$8c2a40c1@PHE> References: <09ce01c26630$ba177cc0$8c2a40c1@PHE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:18:17 +0300, "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi> said: > Is there a reason why SO_TIMESTAMP does not work with TCP sockets > but only with RAW and UDP ? Because it doesn't really make sense? Since the TCP stream may be arbitrarily re-ordered, knowing when a packet arrived is not particularly useful to an application. If you really care, you should probably use BPF instead. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209271743.g8RHhbu6011907>