Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:44:54 -0700 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: signal changes Message-ID: <20020930164453.A51410@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209301638190.82116-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 04:39:26PM -0700 References: <20020930163403.A50643@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209301638190.82116-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> [ Data: 2002-09-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ] > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > * De: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> [ Data: 2002-09-30 ] > > [ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ] > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > > > > > > What limits are the on the number of signals that are stored? > > > > > > > > It's a TailQ. > > > > > > Surely there is a limit or it would be a DOS candidate. > > > > What kind of limit would you like? I can't afford the relevant standards > > or I'd check to see if there was a standard one. I could add a sysctl > > tunable? > > I don't know what standard would be relevant.. > what standard would specify how many signals you could stack up? Teh same that provides specification for queued signals - posix rts. -- Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger jmallett@FreeBSD.org http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jmallett/ | Support my FreeBSD hacking! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020930164453.A51410>