Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 16:19:08 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Traffic shaping Message-ID: <20021006141906.GB27191@rz-ewok.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> In-Reply-To: <1033912218.4051.2.camel@chowder.dons.net.au> References: <200210050655.g956t3Mp091313@lurza.secnetix.de> <006501c26d35$f6904720$1001a8c0@jennie> <20021006132624.GA27191@rz-ewok.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <1033912218.4051.2.camel@chowder.dons.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
## Daniel O'Connor (doconnor@gsoft.com.au): > Actually, if you limit incoming TCP it will adapt to the correct speed. > I do this at home without hassle (except the latency in games goes up > from ~40 to ~100 but it is still acceptable) How much do you have to limit TCP for the desired effect? I never tried shaping on asymmetric lines, and the traffic ratio for a single TCP bulk transfer (1500 (or little less in case of PPPoE, PPTP, etc.) bytes incoming vs. 40 bytes outgoing) does not match the up/down-ratio of his line (1:6) by any means. Regards, cmt -- Spare Space To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021006141906.GB27191>