Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 00:29:50 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: adam@vectors.cx, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Oh No! __sF undefined -> bump all major number of all libraries Message-ID: <20021013.002950.66721950.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20021013053728.GA6176@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20021013021627.GA76789@vectors.cx> <20021012.201917.43022148.imp@bsdimp.com> <20021013053728.GA6176@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20021013053728.GA6176@xor.obsecurity.org>
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
: On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:19:17PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > Yes. libc.so changed its ABI to not encode sizeof(FILE) into every
: > binary. __sF was depricated at that time (something like a year or
: > two ago).
: >
: > Maybe it is only a problem for -current, since libc.so.4 is good, and
: > .5 is a use at your own risk sort of thing. So maybe the right answer
: > is 'never mind' and file it under 'the dangers of running -current'.
:
: The real question is whether this will affect people upgrading from
: RELENG_4. If it causes problems for people tracking -current, that's
: too bad (this kind of situation occurs regularly, e.g. when we upgrade
: the C++ compiler).
I don't think it will impact RELENG_4 -> current, but I've not tried
yet. And upgrading from RELENG_4 seems to be busted right now...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021013.002950.66721950.imp>