Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:21:22 -0600
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        bmah@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: problem in upgrading to latest pkgs
Message-ID:  <200211091421.22782.linimon@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <200211091856.gA9IuxD4079858@intruder.bmah.org>
References:  <13739A17-F376-11D6-A579-000A27AFC7DE@wanadoo.fr> <200211091338.10008.behanna@zbzoom.net> <200211091856.gA9IuxD4079858@intruder.bmah.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I distinctly remember adding it to the manpage.  This was a nice idea
> before portupgrade came along, but too many people managed to shoot
> themselves in the foot with it.

A solution that is possible is to reword the ports webpage to
point out the central role portupgrade plays.  I will attempt to
create a PR for this.

On a very similar note, is portcheckout a less-worthy contender
to portupgrade, and if so, should it be deprecated?

Mark Linimon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211091421.22782.linimon>