Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:54:24 -0500 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com>, libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: serious libh linking problems Message-ID: <20021113165424.GA9768@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> In-Reply-To: <20021113144354.GW94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> References: <20021113040224.GB9054@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <69CC05B0-F6BD-11D6-9957-000393BB9222@queasyweasel.com> <20021113042755.GD9054@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <20021113144354.GW94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed Nov 13, 2002 at 03:43:54PM +0100, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake The Anarcat (anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx): >=20 > > In other words, I think the problem is related more to the way the > > shared libraries are compiled/linked that how pkg_create itself is > > compiled/linked. >=20 > I remember something like this when doing the initial work. > I helped out by just giving _all_ the libraries we compile in the -l > flag, IIRC. Interesting. That might be related to it. Maybe if we try to link libhsysinstall directly against -lh? > I might be able to take a look at this later today :) Thank you. We might even get a dynamic tclh after all! :) A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021113165424.GA9768>