Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:55:52 -0500 (EST)
From:      Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org>
To:        Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: DISABLE_PSE & DISABLE_PG_G still needed?
Message-ID:  <20021115095302.T29662-100000@volatile.chemikals.org>
In-Reply-To: <20021115142953.GC2174@tiiu.internal>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:

> Just finished '-j2 buildworld' and it did well with kernel which had
> the options enabled. Therefore I suppose that those options are
> still absolutely necessary to make use of -current system. These

This may be a bit overstated. I removed those options from my kernel a few
weeks ago and have no problems at all. Are you certain the problem is not
specific to a particular CPU?

> options should be uncommented in NOTES and added to GENERIC
> otherwise new users will be trapped. All old -current users have
> those options probably enabled for a while, that's because there are
> no complaints. Actually, I'm not complaining, just testing out the
> bad things I have encountered in the near past. This darn
> 5.0-RELEASE is nearing way too fast considering the state of
> -current today.

While I am just a small, small voice among many... I must agree :/... The
few things that remain broken for me would be enough to sour testing 5.0
if I wasnt used to working around it.


-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021115095302.T29662-100000>