Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:21:30 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Roger Merritt <mcrogerm@stjohn.ac.th> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Portsupgrade -uU Message-ID: <20021121082130.GA17172@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20021121132627.00a0e670@127.0.0.1> References: <BA011293.2BD6%scott@g-it.ca> <BA011293.2BD6%scott@g-it.ca> <5.2.0.9.0.20021121132627.00a0e670@127.0.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote: > >> > >> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below. How can I fix > >these > >> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies? > >> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine. > > > >If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port > >maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the > >output are just warnings (intended for maintainers). INDEX builds shouldn't have any warnings if you perform them in a clean environment. Either your ports collection is out of date (i.e. in an inconsistent state) or the index build is picking up things from the host environment like installed ports, WITH_*/WITHOUT_* variables, etc. If the latter, it's a bug in portupgrade..someone should investigate and report it to the author. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE93JeKWry0BWjoQKURAjHHAKD9YzCPI5zD+pipWADCifwF2LiYfwCglDg3 76kFIGlInog1u9qTDp44764= =zK52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021121082130.GA17172>