Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:05:54 +0100
From:      Andreas Klemm <akl@klemm.apsfilter.org>
To:        Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Restoring superblock backup?
Message-ID:  <20021215090554.GA15162@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212150040290.41793-100000@root.org>
References:  <20021214125450.GA97486@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212150040290.41793-100000@root.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:41:58AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> After the fs has been repaired, the alternate sb is not copied to the
> default sb (currently).

This doesn't sound valid. It would mean, if your suberblock has
crashed and you use the alternate, then every subsequent fsck
run would fail and need manual operation to use the alternate
superblock.

-- 
Andreas Klemm                             /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
http://www.64bits.de                     <  Powered by FreeBSD  >
http://www.apsfilter.org/                 \   www.FreeBSD.org  /
http://people.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas         \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021215090554.GA15162>