Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:54:34 -0500
From:      "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com>
To:        Marco Radzinschi <marco@radzinschi.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: gateway on different subnet 
Message-ID:  <200212161954.gBGJsZL00622@akiva.homer.att.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:46:12 EST." <20021216144222.N12897-100000@radzinschi.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

When I do the route add default, I get:

tinlizzie# route -v add -net default 10.17.47.37
u: inet 0.0.0.0; u: inet 10.17.47.37; u: inet 0.0.0.0; RTM_ADD: Add Route: len 
128, pid: 0, seq 1, errno 0, flags:<UP,GATEWAY,STATIC
>
locks:  inits: 
sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK>
 default 10.17.47.37 default
route: writing to routing socket: Network is unreachable
add net default: gateway 10.17.47.37: Network is unreachable


----------  In Response to your message -------------

>  Date:  Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:46:12 -0500 (EST)
>  To:  "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com>
>  From:  Marco Radzinschi <marco@radzinschi.com>
>  Subject:  Re: gateway on different subnet
>
>  
>  On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, J. W. Ballantine wrote:
>  
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > In order to save the internet address space, my cable co has setup their
>  > network with a live address for my
>  > PC but an address on a private 10.0.0.0 network for the cable modem.
>  > Now of course, this is also the
>  > gateway and dhcp server.  The problem is trying to get FreeBSD to use
>  > this private address as the gateway for
>  > the live address.    This config works for windows and they claim mac
>  > OS, but I can't get it to work for FreeBSD.  I've tried ifconfig
>  > default, but that returns NO ROUTE TO HOST, and I've thougth about using
>  > an alias on the
>  > NIC, but that would send it out with the private network address and not
>  > be able to find its way home.
>  >
>  > Any of you network wizards out there have the proper spell to get this
>  > working???
>  >
>  > Thanks
>  >
>  > Jim Ballantine
>  
>  As lnog as your internal subnet is different from the cable modem's
>  subnet, you should be fine, as the DHCP client ought to set up the default
>  route for you.
>  
>  Otherwise, "route add default <IP>" should do it.  It is my understanding
>  that the default route should not be the cable modem though, since it is
>  supposed to act like a bridge.
>  
>  AT least this is how it works for me, except that the cable modem has a
>  192.168.100.* address as well as a 10/8, but I don't have either as a
>  default route.
>  
>  Marco Radzinschi
>  E-Mail: marco@radzinschi.com
>  
>  Mon Dec 16 14:42:22 EST 2002
>  



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200212161954.gBGJsZL00622>