Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:45:30 -0500 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getpwnam_r missing Message-ID: <20030110214530.GA23411@attbi.com> In-Reply-To: <200301061855.h06ItO6N088838@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <200301061722.58880.andy@athame.co.uk> <200301061855.h06ItO6N088838@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > (We really should figure out how to implement the _r functions, > because a POSIX.1-2001 system with threads is supposed to have them.) How do these functions need to be implemented? Is it sufficient to re-implement the non-reentrant versions of these functions, but avoid using static data variables? Or does there need to be some use of thread mutexes within the function itself? -- Craig Rodrigues http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc rodrigc@attbi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030110214530.GA23411>