Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:12:20 +0200 From: Alexandr Kovalenko <never@nevermind.kiev.ua> To: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ports-bugs list created Message-ID: <20030115161220.GB81138@nevermind.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20030115161007.GA5731@freebsd.org.ru> References: <20030113023912.GC14933@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1042426140.2162.76.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030113095428.GF50581@k7.mavetju> <20030113210051.GA35193@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030115160830.GA81138@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20030115161007.GA5731@freebsd.org.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Sergey A. Osokin! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:10:07PM +0300, you wrote: > > > > What I think is that from now on the PRs for ports are being mailed > > > > to ports-bugs@ instead of ports@. So all the change-requests, > > > > maintainer updates et al. It will get quiet here... :-) > > > > > > That is correct..the new list is just another majordomo list, and > > > bugmaster is going to transfer the destination for category="ports" PR > > > emails to the new list. > > > > Shouldn't it be good thing to subscribe all, who subscribed to ports@ to > > ports-bugs@ too to not violate user's/porter's expectations? > > I think its not right way. Why? We were getting PRs all the time in ports@, why should this cause any problems to current and future ports@ subscribers. Those, who is waiting for PR-clean ports@ list can unsubscribe from ports-bugs@. -- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030115161220.GB81138>