Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:23:07 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com> Cc: Dominic Marks <dom@cus.org.uk>, freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for performance measurement of john the ripper on ia64 Message-ID: <20030115212307.GA585@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20030115210104.GA7052@openwall.com> References: <20030115054607.GB4457@openwall.com> <JOEOLBOCFFAPLGDIKKCBAEBKCBAA.dominic_marks@btinternet.com> <20030115195445.GA6527@openwall.com> <20030115200902.GA3078@cus.org.uk> <20030115203545.GA6881@openwall.com> <20030115204525.GA3746@cus.org.uk> <20030115210104.GA7052@openwall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:01:04AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:45:25PM +0000, Dominic Marks wrote:
> > On 15/01/2003 23:35, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:09:02PM +0000, Dominic Marks wrote:
> > > > Good, I was already using the generic target for john on Itanium, I'll
> > > > switch this for sparc64 too.
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate it if you could e-mail me benchmarks ("john -test") for
> > > Itanium.
> >
> > Would anyone like to measure the performance of security/john ?
> >
> > The port should build fine.
>
> Of course, I'm most interested in the current development versions
> (should build with "make generic" too), which should be quite a bit
> faster than the 1.6 that's still in FreeBSD ports. Available at:
>
> http://www.openwall.com/john/
Machine: HP rx2600
CPU: McKinley 900MHz (SMP machine with UP kernel)
Version: 1.6 (port)
Perf. compile options: -O -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
Benchmarking: Standard DES [64/64 BS]... DONE
Many salts: 181609 c/s real, 182349 c/s virtual
Only one salt: 161309 c/s real, 161698 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: BSDI DES (x725) [64/64 BS]... DONE
Many salts: 6294 c/s real, 6313 c/s virtual
Only one salt: 6192 c/s real, 6220 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: FreeBSD MD5 [32/64]... DONE
Raw: 1045 c/s real, 1049 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/64]... DONE
Raw: 100 c/s real, 101 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: Kerberos AFS DES [48/64 128K]... DONE
Short: 62222 c/s real, 62396 c/s virtual
Long: 139051 c/s real, 139776 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: NT LM DES [48/64 128K]... DONE
Raw: 572348 c/s real, 574184 c/s virtual
Version: 1.6.32 (development)
Perf. compile options: -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
Benchmarking: Traditional DES [64/64 BS]... DONE
Many salts: 410439 c/s real, 412330 c/s virtual
Only one salt: 335115 c/s real, 336375 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: BSDI DES (x725) [64/64 BS]... DONE
Many salts: 13281 c/s real, 13344 c/s virtual
Only one salt: 12932 c/s real, 13013 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: FreeBSD MD5 [32/64 X2]... DONE
Raw: 2179 c/s real, 2186 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/64]... DONE
Raw: 172 c/s real, 173 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: Kerberos AFS DES [48/64 4K]... DONE
Short: 119169 c/s real, 119594 c/s virtual
Long: 240288 c/s real, 241369 c/s virtual
Benchmarking: NT LM DES [64/64 BS]... DONE
Raw: 2045214 c/s real, 2051074 c/s virtual
FYI,
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030115212307.GA585>