Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:14:46 -0500 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: Kenneth Culver <culverk@yumyumyum.org>, Atte Peltomaki <atte.peltomaki@iki.fi>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: malloc.conf (was Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE) Message-ID: <20030123191446.GA2602@papagena.rockefeller.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030123185657.GB54656@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20030123123522.C9068-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org> <20030123181628.GA2185@papagena.rockefeller.edu> <20030123185657.GB54656@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson wrote: > > # ls -l /etc/malloc.conf > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Jan 23 11:52 /etc/malloc.conf -> HR< > > H and < should only make a difference if you are low on memory. Yes. > R is on > by default in 5.0 anyway, due to A and J being on by default. That's not what the malloc(3) man page suggests -- R seems to have nothing to do with A or J. Perhaps, however, the improvement I see is due to turning off A and J (implicitly, ie by not specifying them)? - Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030123191446.GA2602>