Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:08:39 -0800 (PST)
From:      David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
To:        mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: How to make an Intel EtherExpress known to xe(4)?
Message-ID:  <200301272308.h0RN8dBK005084@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030127230503.508655D04@ptavv.es.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:05:03 -0800
>From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>

>> I have this one.
>> It's Xircom RealPort(TM) Ethernet 10/100, RE-100. Isn't it?
>> Should I try.. what?

>It should be fixed in current any time now. The Xircom teats FCS as
>part of the frame, but neglected to pass that information on to the
>system. 4.7 has  the same problem, but didn't complain.

>Check the archives for a patch. It was posted over the weekend, I
>think.

For the corresponding Intel part, at least, the patch is already
incorporated into src/sys/dev/xe/if_xe_pccard.c, at rev. 1.7:

----------------------------
revision 1.7
date: 2003/01/25 23:18:01;  author: imp;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -0
Add INTEL EEPRO100

Submitted by: joerg
----------------------------

Cheers,
david       (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david)
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
I have no confidence in results obtained through the use of Microsoft products.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301272308.h0RN8dBK005084>