Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:03:22 +0600 From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: James Pole <james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with NVIDIA kernel driver with recent kernel Message-ID: <20030128120322.A84242@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <1043716452.96617.3.camel@localhost>; from james.pole@paradise.net.nz on Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:14:12PM %2B1300 References: <20030127204647.GA373@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <00b501c2c647$eeb5ba60$0e0c32d4@niked> <20030127230130.GA3246@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1043714433.96161.14.camel@localhost> <1043715322.85849.6.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> <1043716452.96617.3.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:14:12PM +1300, James Pole wrote: > > > Do you *have* to have OpenGL acceleration? > > > > > > If you don't, just simply use the open-source 'nv' driver for XFree86. > > > It is much, much more stable than anything NVIDIA has to offer. The only > > > downside is that you have to use software OpenGL... > > > > ... and it's slower for 2D as well. > > How can you tell the difference in 2D performance between 'nv' and > NVIDIA's 'nvidia' driver? The difference is very very small -- unless > you can back up your claims with 2D benchmarks which proves that > NVIDIA's driver is indeed better at 2D... does 'nv' driver support xv? /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030128120322.A84242>