Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:36:30 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypto opensslconf-alpha.h opensslconf-i386.h opensslconf-ia64.h opensslconf-powerpc.h opensslconf-sparc64.h Message-ID: <20030129013630.C31562A89E@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200301290106.h0T16F6P029651@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques Vidrine wrote: > nectar 2003/01/28 17:06:15 PST > > Modified files: > secure/lib/libcrypto opensslconf-alpha.h opensslconf-i386.h > opensslconf-ia64.h opensslconf-powerpc.h > opensslconf-sparc64.h > Log: > Force OPENSSL_NO_KRB5. OpenSSL's current implementation of RFC 2712 > can only be built with MIT Kerberos. > > If we didn't define this here, then SSL-using applications would have > to define OPENSSL_NO_KRB5 themselves in order to build. Ok, but what does this mean in the real world? Do krb5 users need to stop building world? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030129013630.C31562A89E>