Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:38:48 -0600 (CST) From: "M. L. Dodson" <bdodson@scms.utmb.EDU> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Message-ID: <200302032038.h13KcmjU052443@histidine.utmb.edu> In-Reply-To: <xzpbs1t6sm4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 Feb, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> writes: >> [why was Matt Dillon's commit bit removed] > > Short version: there was a difference of opinions. > > As for the long version - there are probably as many versions of this > story as there are people involved in it. > > My advice is to let it lie. > > DES I'm afraid that just won't do. The _USERS_ deserve a better explanation than that for removal of one of the, if not the, most productive developers of the project. The hubris of keeping this secret is really beyond the pale, folks. This is the kind of attitude that generates forks. Will anyone comment on how well NetBSD runs on Intel hardware? Just in case. M. L. Dodson; now going back to lurking. -- M. L. Dodson bdodson@scms.utmb.edu 409-772-2178 FAX: 409-772-1790 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302032038.h13KcmjU052443>