Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:58:54 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: alane@geeksrus.net, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lame > lame-devel Message-ID: <20030204115854.65388cec.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030203134841.GA88265@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20030203134841.GA88265@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:48:41 -0500
"AlanE [admin]" <root@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> wrote:
> Does anyone else find it strange that lame-devel is an older, somewhat
> broken port, when compared to lame? Maybe it should be retired and left
> to live out its golden years in the Attic. Just a thought...
I expect a new beta version of LAME in some months (perhaps one or two).
Then lame-devel would be nice to have. I know we can bring it back to
life from the Attic, but wouldn't it be enough to mark it broken until
then?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Loose bits sink chips.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030204115854.65388cec.Alexander>