Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:09:56 -0500 (EST) From: Geoffrey <geoffrey@reptiles.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ? Message-ID: <20030227230123.M28626-100000@iguana.reptiles.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030227183209.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > It points out that no one uses I386 kernels. Is it more valuable > to have GENERIC_I386 or KDE on disc 1? If it came down to that I > would pick KDE. > This is getting silly. As much respect as I have for you, KDE is not and shouldn't be part of this OS. Should Gnome be on the first disc too then? What about Windowmaker or fvwm? I was evidently under the mistaken impression this was about nuts and bolts. If we are to focus on window dressing, we are definitely hozed. Cheers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030227230123.M28626-100000>