Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 04:16:13 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber), freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNING: portupgrade considered harmful Message-ID: <200303010416.50699.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <b3p0u6$kt$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <3E5FB1F8.4050405@mail.flyingcroc.net> <b3p0u6$kt$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_gYCY+lDE1f6e5QP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 01 March 2003 02:04, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Joe Kelsey <joek@mail.flyingcroc.net> wrote: > > Some time ago, the maintainers of the pkgtools slipped a new ability > > into portupgrade: the ability to silently move "obsolete" shared > > libraries into /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg. [...] > > because ld will silently use old, obsolete libraries instead of the new > > libraries! > > I don't understand this. /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg is not in ld's > search path, why should it pick up libraries from there? Because portupgrade/portsclean runs ldconfig accordingly after moving/delet= ing=20 libraries. =2D-=20 Regards, Michael Nottebrock --Boundary-02=_gYCY+lDE1f6e5QP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+YCYfXhc68WspdLARAqFTAKCUKUOaqzY8Dk6j9yOHa5bDoxDQyACfSkzi z7mj8BFowIiZzloGuATu4RU= =fTM/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_gYCY+lDE1f6e5QP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303010416.50699.michaelnottebrock>