Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:39:06 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Till Riedel <till@f111.hadiko.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libm problem Message-ID: <200303231939.10040.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20030323182405.GA2135@f111.hadiko.de> References: <20030323182405.GA2135@f111.hadiko.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sunday 23 March 2003 19:24, Till Riedel wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:43:16PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > Just out of curiousity, have you tried using -mfpmath=sse? I remember > > someone on this list claiming that the SSE fpa-code works much better > > than the i387 code which is used by default (even with -march=pentium4). > > seems to be equally fast with whetstone benchmark , Actually, when I said "better", I really meant "doesn't break -O(ptimized) code" rather than "faster". :) -- Regards, Michael Nottebrock [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+ff9OXhc68WspdLARAryQAJ4xjgTb9cQADxvmCsodCYs1FDsBFwCfYtfR 8E7mXh4ugVSi/SEsWw7w+Ho= =ejUZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303231939.10040.michaelnottebrock>