Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:30:21 -0600 From: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: twig les <twigles@yahoo.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: another TCPDump update question Message-ID: <20030324093021.A8296@sheol.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20030324151410.GE94153@madman.celabo.org>; from nectar@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:14:10AM -0600 References: <20030311231326.82217.qmail@web10107.mail.yahoo.com> <20030324151410.GE94153@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 24, at 09:14 AM, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:13:26PM -0800, twig les wrote: > > The reason this ties into freebsd-security and not -questions is > > I'm still waiting for official word on a patch/upgrade procedure > > from the team. Am I being impatient here or did I miss > > something? I checked back over security-notifications and saw > > nothing. > > You didn't miss anything. There won't be a security advisory for this > issue. No? Without insulting anyone, may I ask why not? tcpdump is included in the base/standard OS, afterall, and so is libpcap, which appears to be related. IIRC, there have been SAs for DOS vulnerabilities before. What or where is the line for what is or is not eligible for a SA? > Cheers, > Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ Thanks, Dave -- ______________________ ______________________ \__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/ \________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/ http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030324093021.A8296>