Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:51:07 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: Not providing static libraries (libkse/libpthread) Message-ID: <20030326195107.GB31787@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10303261441100.9412-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <20030326193524.GA11320@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10303261441100.9412-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Mar 26), Daniel Eischen said: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > For example, the access sequences generated by compilers for > > variables that have the __thread attribute do really suck for when > > code is to be generated for dynamic linking. The access sequences > > in the static case are superior. The performance gain is > > significant if one can build a complete multi-threaded application. > > Solaris and IRIX don't seem to provide static thread libraries. Does > anyone know if Linux does? Debian provides static versions: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 81959 Feb 25 07:46 /lib/libpthread-0.10.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97286 Feb 25 07:47 /usr/lib/libpthread.a As does Redhat 7.3: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 105945 Oct 10 09:51 /lib/libpthread-0.9.so* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 118146 Oct 10 09:51 /usr/lib/libpthread.a -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030326195107.GB31787>