Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:27:16 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BROKEN ports scheduled for removal Message-ID: <20030328222716.GC23305@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030328182026.GA7123@moo.holy.cow> References: <20030328052350.GA18971@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030328182026.GA7123@moo.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:20:26PM -0500, parv wrote: > in message <20030328052350.GA18971@rot13.obsecurity.org>, > wrote Kris Kennaway thusly... > > > > The following ports have been marked BROKEN for at least 4 months > > and are scheduled for removal after May 1 2003. >=20 > Kris, would there be any chance of removing a port which doesn't > build & has a pr pending for almost an year? >=20 > A few minutes ago, i tried to build editors/nvi-perl again on > FreeBSD 4.7-p8 w/ Perl 5.8. That failed again. Of course. PR > is... >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/37730 It builds fine on stock 4.x, but fails on 5.0. I'll mark it BROKEN on 5.0. I can't think of an easy way to indicate that it does not compile with newer perl versions. We probably need a BUILD_CONFLICTS directive similar to the runtime (package) conflicts patches I am testing. Kris --ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+hMxEWry0BWjoQKURAipsAJ9ZKePEiS0WvV7cfNVxoFy9vniqxACgxnyf /T3DK3JBorTo/t7GBlPLHr4= =8TYz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030328222716.GC23305>