Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:45:48 +0200
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz>
To:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: pear-* packages
Message-ID:  <20030409084548.GH657@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20030408213349.GB99494@graf.pompo.net>
References:  <20030406162733.GB657@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20030406164717.GB9642@graf.pompo.net> <20030408213349.GB99494@graf.pompo.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# thierry@pompo.net / 2003-04-08 23:33:49 +0200:
> Le Dim  6 avr 03 ? 18:47:17 +0200, Thierry Thomas <thierry@pompo.net>
>  écrivait :
> > Actually, the existing PEAR packages register themselves! For example,
> > check sysutils/pear-Log, target post-install:
> 
> Hmm... This is an error: it works fine with a 'make install', but
> post-install is not executed by pkg_add => should be fixed by
> PR ports/50737 (<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=50737>)
> with a pkg-install.

    right, this is what I was trying to say.

    hmmm, one question, though: is installing package.xml actually
    necessary? AFAICT it's only needed during the install. isn't there
    another way to get that file into the package with make package?

    also, if they do need to be on the plist to be picked up, is
    ${PREFIX}/.PEAR.pkg the best place? wouldn't ${PEARDIR}/.pkg or
    ${PREFIX}/var/PEAR or something like that be better?

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030409084548.GH657>