Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:21:52 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: "."@babolo.ru Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade & RO ports tree (was Re: [kris@freebsd.org: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk]) Message-ID: <20030422062152.GA18011@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <1050982709.421032.879.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> References: <003b01c307f5$8c936e00$0480763e@semhome> <1050982709.421032.879.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:38:29AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > Hm, execuse me my sarcasm, but do we really need the second portupgra= de > > > in C??? > >=20 > > I see two main reasons: > > 1) portupgrade is not in base system and never be there because of ruby. > > 2) Because it is in ruby :) > 3) Because it do not works on RO mounted /usr/ports It does. I have always run it in such a setup. --Stijn --=20 "Linux has many different distributions, meaning that you can probably find one that is exactly what you want (I even found one that looked like a Unix system)." -- Mike Meyer, from a posting at questions@freebsd.org --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+pN+AY3r/tLQmfWcRAmsoAJ47zrJEEswSQfAZquYUyrFV0SGb6wCgpQXS NXEOXL3vRPnH/0B+ZsUGvRM= =yGrR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030422062152.GA18011>