Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:36:53 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x86-64 support Message-ID: <20030425043653.GA72390@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030424181501.1B3972A7EA@canning.wemm.org> References: <20030424172440.GB14946@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20030424181501.1B3972A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:15:01AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: >Wilko Bulte wrote: >> > And I would have thought it would have been obvious.. :-/ >> >> I would have thought so too... :-/ >> >> Maybe have it display: 3.1415926535897 MHz? I also thought it looked a bit dodgy until I read the disclaimer at the end. How about 2.71828182846 MHz? Or maybe 299.7925 MHz. >Don't get me started... :-) I still have the first ~50 or so digits >memorized. Or even worse, I could put a pi calculator in the kernel. :-) And people think I'm wierd because I know the first 19 digits :-). Why not just print a random number? Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030425043653.GA72390>