Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:46:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: `Hiding' libc symbols (was Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen ...) Message-ID: <200304301646.h3UGklUx051071@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030430164135.GB26508@madman.celabo.org> References: <20030430004907.GA32349@mero.morphisms.net> <20030430031856.GA20258@madman.celabo.org> <20030430144149.GA7786@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030430002014.GA1190@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304300024280.1846-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <20030430043303.GA46365@mero.morphisms.net> <20030430062647.GA82023@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030430143121.GK39658@survey.codeburst.net> <20030430152708.GA26216@madman.celabo.org> <20030430153645.GL39658@survey.codeburst.net> <20030430154936.GA58835@mero.morphisms.net> <20030430164135.GB26508@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:41:35 -0500, "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> said: > Package X defines a function named `strlcpy', that works well for > Package X and may or may not have any relationship to the `strlcpy' > we all know and love from OpenBSD. > Which of the following scenarios is the least astonishing? Secnario 4. Package X fails to build with a linker error because the user has attempted to define something that he is not entitled to redefine. (No, I don't know how to accomplish this with our existing toolchain.) -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304301646.h3UGklUx051071>