Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      5 May 2003 16:31:23 -0000
From:      tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas Seck)
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default!
Message-ID:  <20030505163123.16044.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030505152136.GB31920@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kris Kennaway (kris@obsecurity.org):

> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:29:45PM -0000, Thomas Seck wrote:

>> I can live with a 'NO_KERBEROS' make option.
>> 
>> Having the kerberos stuff in a separate tarball and de-selectable in
>> sysinstall is enough to 'satisfy' my needs. I wonder why Kerberos was
>> always part of the default installation set anyway?
> 
> With recent changes, Kerberos is no longer separate or de-selectable
> from sysinstall, unless you also get rid of e.g. openssh.  That's part
> of what we're discussing.

So be it, I am not to decide whether this is 'A Good Thing'. And pardon 
me to have disturbed you 'while you were discussing'. It will not happen
again.

     --Thomas



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030505163123.16044.qmail>