Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:38:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Scot Loach <sloach@sandvine.com> Cc: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Kernel tuning for large maxsockets Message-ID: <20030715173449.R18075@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533701AE8534@mail.sandvine.com> References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533701AE8534@mail.sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Scot Loach wrote: > Is there any reason I should not modify the kernel code to only let a small, > fixed number of raw and divert pcbs be preallocated instead of having them > scale with maxsockets? Your idea is sound. > Next, does this seem like a generally useful thing that could be rolled back > into the source tree? I could make this a kernel option or a tunable sysctl > variable. > > thanks > > Scot Loach A tunable maximum for each of those settings sounds good, that should fit well in subr_param.c. Send me your patch when it's done, and I'll look into incorporating it. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030715173449.R18075>