Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:36:50 +0200
From:      Matthias Schuendehuette <msch@snafu.de>
To:        obrien@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with new gcc)
Message-ID:  <200307181936.50526.msch@snafu.de>
In-Reply-To: <20030717061430.GB96381@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <200307142038.h6EKciQ06885@mailgate5.cinetic.de> <20030715090740.GA77879@phys9911.phys.tue.nl> <20030717061430.GB96381@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:14, David O'Brien wrote:
> I'm willing to commit it as such, but I'd like to hear more people's
> opinion.

What I found so far:

- gvim 6.2.21 works under 'twm'
- gvim 6.2.21 works under 'kde 3.1' with SESSION_MANAGER unset
- gvim 6.2.21 works under 'kde 3.1' if running on a remote machine 
  tunneled through ssh's X11-redirection

as reported by others:

- gvim 6.2.21 works without patch 015

I looked at patch 015 but I'm not familiar with X11 
SessionManagerProtocol - perhaps some others are able to analyze the 
correctness of that patch...
-- 
Ciao/BSD - Matthias

Matthias Schuendehuette	<msch [at] snafu.de>, Berlin (Germany)
PGP-Key at <pgp.mit.edu> and <wwwkeys.de.pgp.net> ID: 0xDDFB0A5F



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307181936.50526.msch>