Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:51:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: buggy optimization levels... Message-ID: <20030731225137.GA15353@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3F1322A9.8080805@mac.com> References: <3F1322A9.8080805@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 05:37:45PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi, all-- >=20 > The "known bugs" section of the GCC info documentation lists 5 issues; "m= an=20 > gcc" lists none. Can someone provide a test case for a bug involving "cc= =20 > -O" versus "cc -O3" under FreeBSD 4-STABLE for the x86 architecture? Probably not, or it would have already been fixed. The warning against using FreeBSD with settings higher than -O1 (=3D=3D -O) is because it often causes bugs that are difficult to track down (e.g. some aspect of the kernel just doesn't work properly). Kris --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KZ15Wry0BWjoQKURAmH6AKD2GZptN9Wy+xzOIuslEEcr7iAT7gCeIQdO nEVnItqPz7rGGL0k7dq+A1A= =jahk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030731225137.GA15353>