Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:55:05 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Ports scheduled for removal on Nov 7 Message-ID: <20030809015505.GA2522@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030809013414.GY1741@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20030808045334.GA97079@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030809013414.GY1741@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 11:04:14AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Thursday, 7 August 2003 at 21:53:34 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > The following ports are scheduled for removal on November 7 if they > > are still broken at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix > > them. If you are interested in saving these ports, please send your > > patches to the maintainer. If the maintainer is unresponsive or the > > port has no maintainer, then please submit them via send-pr. >=20 > I don't see anything that worries me, but some of th things look > relatively familiar. Would it not be a good idea to distribute this > list more widely so that users can be warned So far I have: * mailed the maintainers * force-committed to every affected port * mailed to the port mailing list. What more do you suggest? > and possibly pay somebody to fix them? Feel free :) Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/NFR4Wry0BWjoQKURAqv0AJ9YRHNgphyFReJp3r2djAdGE3au9QCcCSbC GywiRygwC3/wK735rHCRufA= =Otoe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030809015505.GA2522>