Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:54:19 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: -doc/bugs issue/question Message-ID: <20030811125419.266958a0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greetings, This is a simple question/issue I've been thinking of: Many people submit patches in their PRs; however, many of them are not applied because they are submitted for a stable branch and many developers simply lack the time to merge it into current. Perhaps in our PR/bugs documentation, we could recommend that: A patch against the CURRENT or HEAD CVS branch is preffered since all new code should be applied and tested first. After appropriate or substational testing has been done, the code will be merged/migrated to the STABLE branch. What is the general opinion of the -doc team on this? -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030811125419.266958a0.trhodes>