Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 03:15:46 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM Gate. Message-ID: <20030817011545.GW395@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030815114948.94219A-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <20030815111856.GN395@garage.freebsd.pl> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030815114948.94219A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--X8oaj2qX3NXXvcHN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 11:53:11AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: +> That said, I think the geom gate stuff looks very cool :-). You might be +> able to run some interesting performance numbers comparing NFS and UFS +> over a remote block device. Ok. After last geom gate optimizations I'm ready to show some tests. NFS read: 2539890 bytes/sec NFS write: 2668428 bytes/sec GG read file: 5791796 bytes/sec (file was exported) GG write file: 4071411 bytes/sec (file was exported) GG read device: 4635277 bytes/sec (disk device was exported) GG write device: I wasn't able to test This was tested over 100Mbit/s network without any network tuning. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek pawel@dawidek.net UNIX Systems Programmer/Administrator http://garage.freebsd.pl Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://cerber.sourceforge.net --X8oaj2qX3NXXvcHN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBPz7XQT/PhmMH/Mf1AQHVgAP/flIvogU07tlCWj4mLcBf74z/XFb7m4FV UDq5jAF+tTQEdzqzPQMybRrxTBZ7vKmH0c6iYs0tTv8um3B3ClFsMaVjfThFF5s3 Iaghj3lmk22edRC4jyoOGh28kejkKbCMVy4A6qFj7QxLylzvkKCULDdLMpCq+TMt /REq/zGedGY= =cKp8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X8oaj2qX3NXXvcHN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030817011545.GW395>