Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:59:30 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Apache dependence Message-ID: <20030818195930.GB73409@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3F40CC65.1000204@ciam.ru> References: <3F4037B9.1010604@ciam.ru> <20030818051533.GA70270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3F40CC65.1000204@ciam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:53:57PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:19:37AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > > >>How people decide the problem with ports depended on Apache? > >>It is known there is a few apache ports, how to decide what port to=20 > >>depend on? > > > > > >See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/32604 > >The patch needs to be updated to use APACHE_PORT instead. >=20 > But how is it works? Where APACHE_PORT is set? There is no such variable= =20 > in Mk/bsd.*.mk. > I've seen no patch where you point. The PR proposes to use AP_PORT to hold the category/portname of the default apache port to use. As discussed in the audit trail of the PR, the variable should be named APACHE_PORT instead. Kris --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/QTAiWry0BWjoQKURAsv+AKD8JjNdLcRh9UktqnfzEEIK39mNUACgtBMZ sw/2YcivUNkZV5weuJPYMy0= =kf0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030818195930.GB73409>