Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:30:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: NO_FOO knobs in make.conf Message-ID: <20030909153039.GA942@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309060440130.18871-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20030905.183837.116096286.imp@bsdimp.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309060440130.18871-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:42:12AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message: <20030905140628.H90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> > > Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> writes: > > : Once we get general consensus (not universal agreement :) on this, I'll > > : take responsibility for marshaling the aforementioned volunteer > > : resources. > > > > I'd just do it. we've already talked this to death. Lots of people > > want it, some don't. Every time we talk about it, that's the > > outcome. Let's just do it and get on with our lives. > > Or change all the NO*, NO_* to WANT_* and default them to yes. That would be inconsistent with the ports tree. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/XfIfWry0BWjoQKURApXeAKDWx1DRqnbGXLQDDFx3BQdFHcluiQCfXl/I UYSHRWU7WJ3LnBjmJfP1P+g= =0yup -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030909153039.GA942>