Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:32:51 -0700 From: Bill Campbell <freebsd@celestial.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x? Message-ID: <20031005003251.GA20735@alexis.mi.celestial.com> In-Reply-To: <20031004164554.X3248@atlas.home> References: <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net> <20031004164554.X3248@atlas.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: ... >Having had some experience writing pam modules on a number of >platforms, I whipped out my suite of pam test modules to have a look >at this incredbible breakage you speak of. I mean, there is a >specification for pam after all. Could you suggest where to look for information on writing modules to handle session tasks? I've looked at the PAM stuff superficially over the years, and would be very interested in doing something with the session modules to do things like automatically creating missing home directories with appropriate links to automounted directories. I haven't done much with this on FreeBSD yet since I need pam_ldap and nss_ldap support which only seems to be available in the 5.x tree. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 http://www.celestial.com/ You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031005003251.GA20735>