Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:16:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kenny Freeman <kennyf@pchg.net> Cc: Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.info> Subject: Re: Jail FS questions. Message-ID: <20031010011640.GE10682@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net> References: <20030803200948.GA10712@lewiz.org> <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:00:02PM -0400, Kenny Freeman wrote: > > I've been reading about unionfs and nullfs (well, more skim reading > > really; I'm not FS guru, which is why I'm asking here) and one of these > > sounds like it could be the idea solution. At first glance I'd say that > > unionfs would be the way to go. Both unionfs and nullfs are documented to be broken. Seriously, those big scary warnings in the manpages are there for a reason! Having said that, some people have reported success in certain limited situations. If you insist on using them, then you're on your own if/when it breaks. This means: do not complain to us when your system crashes and you lose a filesystem. Kris --AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/hgh4Wry0BWjoQKURAlunAKDQ++qVxw7Z7gFiBfII9GRuARAglQCghzi/ CHuLIGuoMVOZO9fOgpygtdk= =NAdI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031010011640.GE10682>